CSAT bridges the gap between your intel on customer satisfaction and what you can do to improve it. But it also has limitations that you need to know about. Understanding these can help you get useful information out of your survey.
- It’s easily measurable
- It produces data that can be interpreted effortlessly
- It’s easier for consumers to understand
- It is popular with customers
- It predicts customer churn
Here are brief explanations of each advantage:
CSAT can help you uncover more information with a single question than you can with multiple survey questions. This is especially true when it comes to recording customer responses. As such, CSAT is easier than other customer experience metrics to work with for data acquisition.
From onboarding to purchasing, CSAT can be used to collect feedback at every step of the consumer journey. Since the scores are displayed in the form of numbers, they are easier to understand.
For example; A happy customer can tick off the number 5 (extremely satisfied option) on the CSAT survey. An unhappy buyer can similarly tick off number 1 (extremely unsatisfied option).This produces numerical data which can be interpreted effortlessly.
Unlike other surveys, you don’t need to inundate your customers with lots of questions when asking them to fill out a CSAT survey. Users can simply answer a single two-part question, which is enough to collect feedback. This is why consumers find it easy to understand.
CSAT is one of the most heavily benchmarked customer experience metrics. Moreover, the survey consists of only one question and is widely used, making it popular with consumers. Using a globally renowned survey helps understand buyers' sentiments, regardless of their location. This is why businesses worldwide use CSAT to measure their buyers' happiness and satisfaction.
It predicts customer churn
It's challenging to spot unhappy customers (detractors) with limited customer data. But with CSAT, you can evaluate specific interactions between the people and your brand, as well as their overall experience. This way, it becomes easier to identify customer churn (when they’ll leave). And you can focus your retention efforts on the pain points to improve overall satisfaction.
- It is susceptible to human error
- It has potential for cultural bias
- It measures post-interaction sentiment only
Any survey can be susceptible to human error, and the same can be said of CSAT. Whether the form contains a single question, or utilizes templates that include follow-up questions, mistakes can always be made. For example, your survey may focus on the wrong things or it might be structured in a way that a customer interprets differently from the way you would.
Customer satisfaction metrics deal with macroscopic views of happiness and dissatisfaction. Users from various regions can express these sentiments differently. For example, an Australian can rate service quality as “terrible” or “super”. In contrast, a user from the United Kingdom can choose to reply with “very bad” or “extremely satisfied”. Therefore, surveyors need to keep an eye out for bias as it can impact the overall scores.
CSAT measures how a consumer is feeling about your services right after they have had an interaction with your brand. This is where the metric can face limitations in terms of survey responses and response rates. It can be affected by the user’s mood on any given day.
In simple words, a visitor having a bad day can affect your scores. Similarly, a buyer’s happiness can also prove lucky for you. Overall, it might not be such a bad thing given your objectives.